top of page
Center laptop.png
RoofReport_iphone.png
Building insights at
your fingertips

​

Inspection services that use drones and other advanced technology to quickly develop comprehensive reports and data insights that building owners love.

​

"This technology has completely changed how we conduct building inspections."

Jeff Patterson, P.E.
Vice President  |  PMA Engineering

Drones are a workforce multiplier

Structural & Civil Engineers | Architects | Property Managers | Commercial Roofers | Project Managers | Superintendents

North.JPG

28-Story Building Inspection

High-Def Inspection

Traditional Methods vs Drone Methods:

​

Traditional

  • Erect sophisticated scaffold and swing stages for multi-week inspection.

 

Drone

  • Drone serves as preliminary means of inspection. Cutting out several weeks of traditional inspection.

Why drones were the best option:

Speed

  • Inspection timeline with drone - 3 days vs multi-week.

 

Cost

  • Using drone saved owner ~$80K in scaffolding rental and inspection man hours.

 

Worker Safety

  • Drone replaced boots on a scaffold.

 

Public Safety

  • Owners can make real-time actionable public safety decisions.

 

Accessible

  • Clean data that can be easily stored and accessed for future use.

Thermal_Example_1.jpg

Thermal Facade & Roof Inspection

Thermal Inspection

Traditional Methods vs Drone Methods:

​

Traditional (Roof)

  • Core cuts executed on the roof.

 

Traditional (Windows/Facade)

  • Swing stages for 1-2 week inspection.

 

Drone (Roof)

  • Thermal camera detects water penetration on roof.

 

Drone (Windows/Facade)

  • Drone served as preliminary means of inspection. Cutting out several days of traditional inspection.

Why drones were the best option:

Precision

  • Thermal sees what the naked eye can’t.

​

Speed

  • Inspection timeline with drone - 1 days vs multi-week.

 

Cost

  • Saved owner ~$40K in swing stage and inspection hours.

 

Worker Safety

  • Drone replaced boots on a scaffold.

 

Accessible

  • Clean data that can be easily stored and accessed for future use.

3d Model.jpg

Map, Model, and BIM

Aerial Mapping

Traditional Methods vs Drone Methods:

​

Traditional

  • Boots-in-the-field to physically access and measure points in hazardous or difficult-to-reach locations.


Drone

  • When mapping challenging terrain, drones make it no longer necessary for human operators to physically access and measure points in hazardous or difficult-to-reach locations. Traditional methods require meticulous measurement, preparation, and planning, drones can capture comparable data in dramatically shorter timeframes.

Why drones were the best option:

Precision

  • Centimeter-level positional accuracy when capturing digital geospatial data. Drone meets the accuracy standards of the American Society of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing (ASPRS).

​

Speed

  • Drone can accurately map an entire area in minutes vs hours/days with traditional boots-in-the-field methods.

 

Cost

  • Precision data mapping results in accurate cost calculations across multiple phases of the project.  

 

Worker Safety

  • Drone allowed for the mapping of areas that would otherwise be inaccessible.

​

Flexibility

  • One drone flight produces thousands of measurements, which can be represented in different formats (orthomosaic, point cloud, DTM, DSM, contour lines, etc).

​

Repeatability

  • Drone missions re-flown multiple times throughout the life cycle of the project site with little set-up effort.

 

Accessible

  • Clean data that can be easily stored and accessed for future use.

bottom of page